Does accessibility make the website more expensive or uglier?
In short and in plain language
No. That is a common mistake.
With us, accessibility is part of the plan from the start. It is not a costly extra. Fixing a site later would be costly.
The site can also look good. Clear structure, good readability and calm colours help all visitors. Good looks and accessibility go well together.
No, both are common misconceptions. Accessibility is standard with us from the outset and not a costly surcharge, because we think it in from the start rather than bolting it on afterwards. It is precisely this retrofitting that would be expensive; clean upfront planning is not.
In terms of design, too, accessibility does not stand in the way of good looks, quite the opposite. Clear structures, good readability, calm colour contrasts and well-thought-out operation feel pleasant to all visitors, not just people with impairments. An accessible care website is in practice usually also clearer, faster and easier to understand than a retrofitted solution. Beauty and accessibility are not opposites; together they make up a serious presence that suits the care sector.